Financial Market

Borrowed Time? Downside Scenarios on the US Debt Overhang

The initiation of the rate-hike cycle by the Federal Reserve in 2022 has positioned U.S. monetary policy as a major driver of financial markets. The projected surge in public debt may shift attention to fiscal policy, however. The Congressional Budget Office anticipates U.S. public debt could escalate to a record 116% of GDP over the next decade.[1] While a U.S. default is highly unlikely, historical instances of debt-ceiling tensions suggest potential market disruptions and expanding public debt could have further implications for the world’s largest economy. This blog post explores two downside scenarios for financial markets as investors consider their path forward. The first considers potential macroeconomic effects and their portfolio impact and another that assumes deteriorating U.S. sovereign-debt levels and upward pressure on interest rates may hurt riskier assets and trigger a market sell-off. The potential repercussions on a portfolio of global stocks could vary from a 10% loss in the “macroeconomic impact” scenario to a 19% loss in the “risky-asset sell-off” scenario.

Are risky assets vulnerable?

Since the rate hikes started in 2022, nominal and real Treasury yields have surged after a two-decade decline. Rising sovereign-debt levels could be one of the reasons 10-year rates may not return soon to pre-pandemic levels. The question is whether sustained higher interest rates might hurt riskier assets like stocks and corporate credit through increased capital costs. As we noted in our previous blog post, equities are now relatively expensive compared to Treasury bonds and historical standards. Additionally, credit spreads are tight, leaving more room for losses in a market correction.

Nominal and real Treasury yields have surged; credit spreads are tight

**Nominal and real Treasury yields have surged; credit spreads are tight**


1. **10-year U.S. yields:**

   - The chart shows the trends in nominal and real 10-year U.S. Treasury yields from 2001 to 2023.

   - Nominal yields (blue line) have fluctuated over the years, with notable peaks around 2006-2007 and 2018-2019, followed by a significant rise in recent years.

   - Real yields have generally been lower than nominal yields, with periods of negative yields, particularly around 2012-2013 and 2020-2021. Recently, real yields have also shown an upward trend.


2. **Five-year U.S. corporate option-adjusted spread:**

   - This chart illustrates the option-adjusted spreads for AA and BBB rated U.S. corporate bonds over the same period.

   - The spreads for both AA and BBB bonds have experienced spikes, particularly during the financial crisis of 2008-2009 and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.

   - In recent years, the spreads have tightened, indicating a lower risk premium for corporate bonds.

Two scenarios for financial markets

Macroeconomic impact: Increasing investor concerns about surging sovereign debt push rates higher, raising borrowing costs for businesses and consumers. As the U.S. has a strong track record of managing its debt levels and has the advantage of issuing debt in its own currency, the impact on the economy could be relatively mild: The economy continues to grow, albeit at a slower pace, while inflation rises.[2]

Risky-asset sell-off: Rising rates in combination with a relatively expensive stock market and tight credit spreads could trigger a market sell-off if market sentiment changes. In this scenario, risk-off dynamics dominate and safe-haven assets such as Treasury bonds rally, while the equity sell-off is exacerbated compared to the macroeconomic scenario.[3]

Our scenario assumptions

Scenario assumptions are informed by the MSCI Macro-Finance Analyzer, analysis of historical data and judgment. Breakeven inflation (BEI) is measured in basis points (bps). These are not forecasts, but hypothetical narratives of how the scenarios could affect multi-asset-class portfolios.

Potential implications for financial portfolios

To evaluate the scenarios’ impact on multi-asset-class portfolios, we used MSCI’s predictive stress-testing framework and applied it to a hypothetical portfolio consisting of global and U.S. equities, U.S. bonds and real estate.[4] Under the macroeconomic-impact scenario, the portfolio’s value declined by 10%, while the risky-asset sell-off resulted in a 19% loss.[5] While in the former scenario all the asset classes experienced losses, under the latter scenario Treasurys provided slight offsetting gains against more significant equity losses. Detailed results are illustrated in the exhibit below.

Equity losses in a risky-asset sell-off partly offset by Treasury gains

 

Portfolio impact of the scenarios based on market data as of May 27, 2024. Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence, MSCI

Long-term dynamics can have short-term implications

While investors have focused on the short-term monetary cycle, the implications of rising sovereign debt have been less scrutinized. In this blog post, we explored how markets might fare if the sovereign-debt level takes center stage, altering investors’ macroeconomic expectations or market sentiment, potentially leading to a sudden financial-market repricing.

The authors thank Will Baker and Rick Bookstaber for their contributions to this blog post.

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Get our latest downloads and information first. Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.


    Input this code: captcha